15 June 2018

652. N/EDA in GAMESS. 4. Running NEDA

Posts 1, 2 and 3.

For this you will need to have linked gamess and nbo.

Here's an example input that works:
andy@carbon:~$ less fast/gamess/mgme_tzvp/Mg_tzvp_opt_neda_2.inp ! File created by the GAMESS Input Deck Generator Plugin for Avogadro $CONTRL SCFTYP=RHF RUNTYP=energy DFTTYP=PBE0 ICHARG=1 MULT=1 NOSYM=1 $END ! $PCM SOLVNT=NEPTANE $END ! $PCMCAV RADII=SUAHF $END ! $SCF DIRSCF=.TRUE. $END $BASIS EXTFIL=.TRUE. GBASIS=DEF2SVP $END $system mwords=2000 memddi=500 $end $INTGRL NOPK=1 $END $NBO MOLUNIT <1> > <2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23> $END $DEL NEDA END $END $DATA Title C1 Mg 12.0 3.14572 1.02487 1.29474 N 7.0 4.95329 0.37304 1.62652 N 7.0 3.11530 2.89665 1.82263 C 6.0 5.44265 -0.98008 1.41792 C 6.0 5.80308 1.30078 2.07039 C 6.0 1.96130 3.78017 1.78886 C 6.0 4.28661 3.37927 2.23846 C 6.0 5.48149 2.64462 2.33178 H 1.0 6.31935 3.22840 2.68338 C 6.0 4.36331 4.81950 2.64988 H 1.0 5.37500 5.09552 2.93515 H 1.0 3.70056 5.01438 3.49762 H 1.0 4.03950 5.47541 1.83769 C 6.0 7.22682 0.90313 2.32491 H 1.0 7.68811 0.50750 1.41630 H 1.0 7.27827 0.11050 3.07627 H 1.0 7.81805 1.74612 2.67254 H 1.0 5.81529 -1.43220 2.34182 H 1.0 4.63475 -1.61377 1.04987 H 1.0 6.24793 -1.02060 0.67837 H 1.0 1.72108 4.18678 2.77556 H 1.0 2.10316 4.62224 1.10460 H 1.0 1.08587 3.22835 1.44552 $END


And here's the output:
Natural Energy Decomposition Analysis (Summary): Component Energy(wfn) Energy(wfn) (kcal/mol) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ C7H13N2Mg(+) -583.0832392(scf) -582.9738665(loc) CT = -68.632 ES = -394.694 POL = -353.983 XC = -29.974 1. Mg(+2) -199.0566873(def) -199.0582918(cp) DEF(SE) = 1.007( 0.400) 2. C7H13N2(-) -382.6763191(def) -383.3176043(cp) DEF(SE) = 402.412(176.794) --------- E = -443.864 Electrical (ES+POL+SE) : -571.483 Charge Transfer (CT) : -68.632 Core (XC+DEF-SE) : 196.251 ------------ Total Interaction (E) : -443.864 ..... done with NBO analysis .....
A couple of things to note:
* It runs with PCM, but the results seem nonsensical, in addition to it finding a lot more fragments than without PCM (the latter thing can be amended with NAO)

* If I use DEF2TZVP with PBE0 and DIRSCF=.TRUE. It'll get stuck during the NBO run at
437. RY ( 5) H 23 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 NEXT STEP: Perform one SCF cycle to evaluate the energy of the new density matrix constructed from the deleted NBO Fock matrix. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------- R-PBE0 SCF CALCULATION -------------------------- DENSITY MATRIX CONVERGENCE THRESHOLD= 2.00E-05 COARSE -> FINE DFT GRID SWITCH THRESHOLD= 3.00E-04 (SWITCH IN $DFT) HF -> DFT SWITCH THRESHOLD= 0.00E+00 (SWOFF IN $DFT) DIRECT SCF CALCULATION, SCHWRZ=T FDIFF=T, DIRTHR= 0.00E+00 NITDIR=10 NONZERO BLOCKS ITER EX DEM TOTAL ENERGY E CHANGE DENSITY CHANGE DIIS ERROR INTEGRALS SKIPPED
It's not consuming any CPU at this point (nor is nbo). I'm running w/o DIRSCF now, but it's very slow, and requires ca 30 Gb of scratch space even for a small molecule like this one.

MOLUNIT <1> >
<2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23>
is not necessary for this run. You can simply use NBO $END instead.

No comments:

Post a Comment